Atmospheric Brown Clouds Contribute
to the Slowing of India’s "Green Revolution"
A
pale band of haze covers northern India, just south
of the Himalayas in
this image, taken Feb. 5, 2006, by NASA's Aqua satellite. Haze
also intrudes into the skies of southern Nepal and Bangladesh.
A study by UC researchers suggests that reducing
this type of air pollution could increase rice harvests in India.
(Image
courtesy of Jeff Schmaltz, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
Land Rapid Response Team at the NASA Goddard
Space Flight Center.)
Press release in pdf format.
New
research shows that reductions of human-generated pollution would
generate unexpected agricultural benefits in one of
the world’s poorest
regions. The new findings by Maximilian Auffhammer of the University
of California, Berkeley’s College of Natural Resources, V. "Ram"Ramanathan,
an atmospheric scientist
at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and Jeffrey
Vincent, an economist and environmental research director at the UC
Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation (IGCC), in the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS),
December 26, 2006. Link
to the paper.
Rice harvests in India, which grew dramatically during the "Green
Revolution"of the 1960s and 1970s, have slowed since the mid-1980s,
raising concerns that food shortages could recur in this densely populated
and poor nation. Several explanations for the slowdown have been proposed,
but until now, none took into account the complex interactions of
two pollution-related sources of climate change: atmospheric brown
clouds (ABCs), which form from soot and other fine particles in the
air (collectively termed aerosols), and the better-known problem of
global warming caused by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.
Studies on the agricultural impacts of climate change have focused
on projecting the future effects of greenhouse gases. In the PNAS
paper, Auffhammer, Ramanathan, and
Vincent analyze historical data on Indian rice harvests and examine
the combined effects of atmospheric brown clouds and greenhouse gases.
They find that the combined effects were negative and were greater
after the mid-1980s than before, coinciding with the observed slowdown
in harvest growth. They estimate that harvests would have been up
to 20 to25 percent higher in some years during the 1990s if the negative
climate impacts had not occurred.
Previous research by an international scientific team led by Ramanathan
found that brown clouds have made the Indian subcontinent drier and
cooler. Although this suggests the existence of a climatic tradeoff,
with reductions in aerosols potentially unleashing a stronger warming
trend, joint reductions in the two types of pollutants would in fact
benefit Indian rice farmers. This is because reductions in aerosols
would enhance rainfall, while reductions in greenhouse gases would
reduce nighttime temperatures, which negatively affect growth of the
rice plant.
"Greenhouse gases and aerosols in brown clouds are known to
be competing factors in global warming,"said Ramanathan. "The
major finding of this interdisciplinary study is that their effects
on rice production are additive, which is clearly an unwelcome surprise."
According to Peter Timmer, senior fellow at the Center for Global
Development, the study "links a sophisticated model of agricultural
production in India to climate and pollution models, with the critical
finding that ‘brown cloud’ pollution has already cost
India millions of tons of food production."Vincent noted, "Air
pollution control measures in India have been motivated mainly by
concern about the health of residents of urban areas where most of
the pollution is generated. Our study provides an additional motivation
related to the economic health of poor rural areas.”
Auffhammer added that "while this study focuses on India's
rain-fed states, ABCs exist throughout Asia’s main rice-producing
countries, many of which have experienced decreasing growth rates
in harvests too. Furthering our understanding of how air pollution
affects agricultural yields is very important to ensure food security
in the world’s most populous region.”
The paper is the result of a three-year collaboration among Auffhammer,
Ramanathan, and Vincent. It was supported in part by the Giannini
Foundation, the National Science Foundation,
the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, and IGCC. |